Kenya vs Moldova: Deliberative Democracy Index

Kenya
0.454
in 2025
Moldova
0.442
in 2025
Kenya rank
65th
Moldova rank
67th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Kenya
  • Moldova
00.20.40.6190019622025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.454 against 0.442 in Moldova, a difference of 0.012.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 65th and Moldova ranks 67th of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 5 and Moldova in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Moldova Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0272 0.034 0.0068 Moldova
1910s 0.029 0.0634 0.0344 Moldova
1940s 0.0577 0.0237 0.034 Kenya
1950s 0.0629 0.0649 0.002 Moldova
1960s 0.1442 0.0866 0.0576 Kenya
1970s 0.1491 0.0756 0.0735 Kenya
1980s 0.1536 0.1224 0.0312 Kenya
1990s 0.29 0.3264 0.0364 Moldova
2000s 0.4022 0.2699 0.1323 Kenya
2010s 0.4213 0.4352 0.0139 Moldova
2020s 0.4552 0.5608 0.1057 Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Kenya or Moldova?
Kenya, at 0.454 against 0.442 in Moldova as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Kenya and Moldova?
0.012, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Moldova?
106 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Moldova rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Kenya ranks 65th and Moldova ranks 67th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.