Kazakhstan vs Rwanda: Deliberative Democracy Index

Kazakhstan
0.185
in 2025
Rwanda
0.182
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
121st
Rwanda rank
123rd

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Rwanda
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.185 against 0.182 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 7 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1910s 0.0775 0.004 0.0735 Kazakhstan
1920s 0.0694 0.004 0.0654 Kazakhstan
1930s 0.0319 0.004 0.0279 Kazakhstan
1940s 0.0237 0.004 0.0197 Kazakhstan
1950s 0.0649 0.0055 0.0594 Kazakhstan
1960s 0.0866 0.1049 0.0183 Rwanda
1970s 0.0756 0.0724 0.0032 Kazakhstan
1980s 0.1224 0.0998 0.0226 Kazakhstan
1990s 0.146 0.1462 0.0002 Rwanda
2000s 0.1049 0.1731 0.0682 Rwanda
2010s 0.1146 0.2019 0.0873 Rwanda
2020s 0.1767 0.1982 0.0215 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Kazakhstan or Rwanda?
Kazakhstan, at 0.185 against 0.182 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
0.003, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and Rwanda rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Kazakhstan ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.