Jordan vs Togo: Deliberative Democracy Index
Jordan
0.268
in 2025
Togo
0.288
in 2025
Jordan rank
99th
Togo rank
96th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Jordan
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 0.288 against 0.268 in Jordan, a difference of 0.02.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 99th and Togo ranks 96th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 8 and Togo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.1118 | 0.014 | 0.0978 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.123 | 0.014 | 0.109 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.1245 | 0.0384 | 0.0861 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.1445 | 0.0806 | 0.0639 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.1332 | 0.0848 | 0.0484 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.1195 | 0.027 | 0.0925 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.1199 | 0.0359 | 0.084 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.1911 | 0.1877 | 0.0034 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.2011 | 0.2624 | 0.0613 | Togo |
| 2010s | 0.2153 | 0.3548 | 0.1395 | Togo |
| 2020s | 0.2382 | 0.3198 | 0.0817 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Jordan or Togo?
- Togo, at 0.288 against 0.268 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Jordan and Togo?
- 0.02, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Togo?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Togo rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Jordan ranks 99th and Togo ranks 96th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.