Jordan vs Libya: Deliberative Democracy Index
Jordan
0.268
in 2025
Libya
0.261
in 2025
Jordan rank
99th
Libya rank
100th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Jordan
- Libya
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.268 against 0.261 in Libya, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 99th and Libya ranks 100th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 9 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.123 | 0.004 | 0.119 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.123 | 0.004 | 0.119 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.1461 | 0.0467 | 0.0994 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.1332 | 0.0515 | 0.0817 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.1195 | 0.024 | 0.0955 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.1199 | 0.023 | 0.0969 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.1911 | 0.0345 | 0.1566 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.2011 | 0.0424 | 0.1587 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.2153 | 0.2326 | 0.0173 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.2382 | 0.2323 | 0.0058 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Jordan or Libya?
- Jordan, at 0.268 against 0.261 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Jordan and Libya?
- 0.007, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Libya?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Libya rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Jordan ranks 99th and Libya ranks 100th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.