Iraq vs Togo: Deliberative Democracy Index

Iraq
0.27
in 2025
Togo
0.288
in 2025
Iraq rank
98th
Togo rank
96th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Iraq
  • Togo
00.10.20.30.4190019622025

How they compare

Togo currently reports 0.288 against 0.27 in Iraq, a difference of 0.018.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 98th and Togo ranks 96th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Togo Difference Ahead
1910s 0.0263 0.014 0.0123 Iraq
1920s 0.113 0.014 0.099 Iraq
1930s 0.139 0.014 0.125 Iraq
1940s 0.1372 0.0384 0.0988 Iraq
1950s 0.1403 0.0806 0.0597 Iraq
1960s 0.0659 0.0848 0.0189 Togo
1970s 0.0409 0.027 0.0139 Iraq
1980s 0.0098 0.0359 0.0261 Togo
1990s 0.011 0.1877 0.1767 Togo
2000s 0.1944 0.2624 0.068 Togo
2010s 0.287 0.3548 0.0678 Togo
2020s 0.2688 0.3198 0.051 Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Iraq or Togo?
Togo, at 0.288 against 0.27 in Iraq as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Iraq and Togo?
0.018, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Togo?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Togo rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Iraq ranks 98th and Togo ranks 96th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.