Iraq vs Morocco: Deliberative Democracy Index

Iraq
0.27
in 2025
Morocco
0.278
in 2025
Iraq rank
98th
Morocco rank
97th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Iraq
  • Morocco
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0.278 against 0.27 in Iraq, a difference of 0.008.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1912 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 98th and Morocco ranks 97th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 7 and Morocco in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Morocco Difference Ahead
1910s 0.0267 0.015 0.0118 Iraq
1920s 0.113 0.016 0.097 Iraq
1930s 0.139 0.016 0.123 Iraq
1940s 0.1372 0.0213 0.1159 Iraq
1950s 0.1403 0.0383 0.102 Iraq
1960s 0.0659 0.0771 0.0112 Morocco
1970s 0.0409 0.0871 0.0462 Morocco
1980s 0.0098 0.1033 0.0935 Morocco
1990s 0.011 0.1256 0.1146 Morocco
2000s 0.1944 0.2186 0.0242 Morocco
2010s 0.287 0.2517 0.0353 Iraq
2020s 0.2688 0.2603 0.0085 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Iraq or Morocco?
Morocco, at 0.278 against 0.27 in Iraq as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Iraq and Morocco?
0.008, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Morocco?
114 years are reported by both, from 1912 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Morocco rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Iraq ranks 98th and Morocco ranks 97th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.