Iraq vs Jordan: Deliberative Democracy Index

Iraq
0.27
in 2025
Jordan
0.268
in 2025
Iraq rank
98th
Jordan rank
99th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Iraq
  • Jordan
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.27 against 0.268 in Jordan, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.

Iraq ranks 98th and Jordan ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Jordan Difference Ahead
1920s 0.1173 0.1118 0.0055 Iraq
1930s 0.139 0.123 0.016 Iraq
1940s 0.1372 0.1245 0.0127 Iraq
1950s 0.1403 0.1445 0.0042 Jordan
1960s 0.0659 0.1332 0.0673 Jordan
1970s 0.0409 0.1195 0.0786 Jordan
1980s 0.0098 0.1199 0.1101 Jordan
1990s 0.011 0.1911 0.1801 Jordan
2000s 0.1944 0.2011 0.0067 Jordan
2010s 0.287 0.2153 0.0717 Iraq
2020s 0.2688 0.2382 0.0307 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Iraq or Jordan?
Iraq, at 0.27 against 0.268 in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Iraq and Jordan?
0.002, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Jordan?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Jordan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Iraq ranks 98th and Jordan ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.