Hungary vs Rwanda: Deliberative Democracy Index

Hungary
0.178
in 2025
Rwanda
0.182
in 2025
Hungary rank
126th
Rwanda rank
123rd

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Hungary
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.6191619702025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.182 against 0.178 in Hungary, a difference of 0.004.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 126th and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 9 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Rwanda Difference Ahead
1910s 0.1475 0.004 0.1435 Hungary
1920s 0.1655 0.004 0.1615 Hungary
1930s 0.1726 0.004 0.1686 Hungary
1940s 0.1018 0.004 0.0978 Hungary
1950s 0.0224 0.0055 0.0169 Hungary
1960s 0.0312 0.1049 0.0737 Rwanda
1970s 0.0607 0.0724 0.0117 Rwanda
1980s 0.0853 0.0998 0.0145 Rwanda
1990s 0.6551 0.1462 0.5089 Hungary
2000s 0.6156 0.1731 0.4425 Hungary
2010s 0.3855 0.2019 0.1836 Hungary
2020s 0.2035 0.1982 0.0053 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Hungary or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.182 against 0.178 in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Hungary and Rwanda?
0.004, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Hungary ranks 126th and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.