Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.057 against 0.049 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.008.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Palestine, State of's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 159th and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.071 | 0.049 | 0.022 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1920s | 0.073 | 0.0585 | 0.0145 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1930s | 0.0738 | 0.058 | 0.0158 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1940s | 0.0609 | 0.056 | 0.0049 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Hong Kong, China or Palestine, State of?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.057 against 0.049 in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
- 0.008, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 159th and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.