Guinea vs Iran: Deliberative Democracy Index
Guinea
0.095
in 2025
Iran
0.094
in 2025
Guinea rank
146th
Iran rank
147th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Guinea
- Iran
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.095 against 0.094 in Iran, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Iran ahead.
Guinea ranks 146th and Iran ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Iran in 12.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.003 | 0.0315 | 0.0285 | Iran |
| 1910s | 0.003 | 0.0636 | 0.0606 | Iran |
| 1920s | 0.003 | 0.0263 | 0.0233 | Iran |
| 1930s | 0.003 | 0.0146 | 0.0116 | Iran |
| 1940s | 0.0063 | 0.0983 | 0.092 | Iran |
| 1950s | 0.0346 | 0.0924 | 0.0578 | Iran |
| 1960s | 0.0492 | 0.022 | 0.0272 | Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.038 | 0.0385 | 0.0005 | Iran |
| 1980s | 0.0347 | 0.1591 | 0.1244 | Iran |
| 1990s | 0.1193 | 0.2065 | 0.0872 | Iran |
| 2000s | 0.1008 | 0.2215 | 0.1207 | Iran |
| 2010s | 0.1425 | 0.1684 | 0.0259 | Iran |
| 2020s | 0.0872 | 0.1028 | 0.0157 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Guinea or Iran?
- Guinea, at 0.095 against 0.094 in Iran as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Guinea and Iran?
- 0.001, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iran?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Iran rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Guinea ranks 146th and Iran ranks 147th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.