Georgia vs Romania: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Georgia
- Romania
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.32 against 0.294 in Romania, a difference of 0.026.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Romania ahead.
Georgia ranks 91st and Romania ranks 94th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 7 and Romania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.034 | 0.1431 | 0.1091 | Romania |
| 1910s | 0.0634 | 0.1469 | 0.0835 | Romania |
| 1920s | 0.0694 | 0.1711 | 0.1017 | Romania |
| 1930s | 0.0319 | 0.138 | 0.1061 | Romania |
| 1940s | 0.0237 | 0.0227 | 0.001 | Georgia |
| 1950s | 0.0649 | 0.0172 | 0.0477 | Georgia |
| 1960s | 0.0866 | 0.0306 | 0.056 | Georgia |
| 1970s | 0.0756 | 0.0248 | 0.0508 | Georgia |
| 1980s | 0.1224 | 0.0232 | 0.0992 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 0.1712 | 0.358 | 0.1868 | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.3084 | 0.39 | 0.0816 | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.468 | 0.4489 | 0.0191 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.446 | 0.3707 | 0.0753 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Georgia or Romania?
- Georgia, at 0.32 against 0.294 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Georgia and Romania?
- 0.026, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Romania?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Romania rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Georgia ranks 91st and Romania ranks 94th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.