Gambia vs Israel: Deliberative Democracy Index
Gambia
0.486
in 2025
Israel
0.511
in 2025
Gambia rank
55th
Israel rank
52nd
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Gambia
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.511 against 0.486 in Gambia, a difference of 0.025.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 55th and Israel ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.06 | 0.0117 | 0.0483 | Gambia |
| 1910s | 0.06 | 0.0321 | 0.0279 | Gambia |
| 1940s | 0.081 | 0.28 | 0.199 | Israel |
| 1950s | 0.0807 | 0.3684 | 0.2877 | Israel |
| 1960s | 0.1508 | 0.4195 | 0.2687 | Israel |
| 1970s | 0.2412 | 0.5121 | 0.2709 | Israel |
| 1980s | 0.2354 | 0.5954 | 0.36 | Israel |
| 1990s | 0.1404 | 0.626 | 0.4856 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.0766 | 0.6221 | 0.5455 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.1694 | 0.5919 | 0.4225 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.4463 | 0.568 | 0.1217 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Gambia or Israel?
- Israel, at 0.511 against 0.486 in Gambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Gambia and Israel?
- 0.025, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Israel?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Israel rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Gambia ranks 55th and Israel ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.