Gabon vs Uganda: Deliberative Democracy Index
Gabon
0.227
in 2025
Uganda
0.228
in 2025
Gabon rank
112th
Uganda rank
110th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Gabon
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.228 against 0.227 in Gabon, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Uganda ahead.
Gabon ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 110th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 7 and Uganda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.005 | 0.018 | 0.013 | Uganda |
| 1920s | 0.005 | 0.0225 | 0.0175 | Uganda |
| 1930s | 0.005 | 0.023 | 0.018 | Uganda |
| 1940s | 0.0388 | 0.0317 | 0.0071 | Gabon |
| 1950s | 0.1141 | 0.0611 | 0.053 | Gabon |
| 1960s | 0.1357 | 0.1551 | 0.0194 | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.1024 | 0.0117 | 0.0907 | Gabon |
| 1980s | 0.1024 | 0.1184 | 0.016 | Uganda |
| 1990s | 0.2694 | 0.2677 | 0.0017 | Gabon |
| 2000s | 0.2937 | 0.26 | 0.0337 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0.3276 | 0.2665 | 0.0611 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0.25 | 0.2445 | 0.0055 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Gabon or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.228 against 0.227 in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Gabon and Uganda?
- 0.001, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Uganda?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Uganda rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Gabon ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 110th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.