Eritrea vs Sudan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Eritrea
- Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.025 against 0.023 in Sudan, a difference of 0.002.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sudan ahead.
Eritrea ranks 170th and Sudan ranks 171st of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Sudan in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.007 | 0.019 | 0.012 | Sudan |
| 1910s | 0.007 | 0.019 | 0.012 | Sudan |
| 1920s | 0.007 | 0.019 | 0.012 | Sudan |
| 1930s | 0.0068 | 0.019 | 0.0122 | Sudan |
| 1940s | 0.0981 | 0.0195 | 0.0786 | Eritrea |
| 1950s | 0.0797 | 0.0662 | 0.0135 | Eritrea |
| 1960s | 0.0483 | 0.0548 | 0.0065 | Sudan |
| 1970s | 0.0214 | 0.0551 | 0.0337 | Sudan |
| 1980s | 0.012 | 0.099 | 0.087 | Sudan |
| 1990s | 0.0485 | 0.0378 | 0.0107 | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.029 | 0.0516 | 0.0226 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.0236 | 0.0697 | 0.0461 | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0298 | 0.0603 | 0.0305 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Eritrea or Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 0.025 against 0.023 in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Eritrea and Sudan?
- 0.002, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sudan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and Sudan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Eritrea ranks 170th and Sudan ranks 171st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.