Equatorial Guinea vs Yemen: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Yemen
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.045 against 0.039 in Yemen, a difference of 0.006.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Yemen ranks 164th of 175 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.014 | 0.0117 | 0.0023 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1910s | 0.014 | 0.0323 | 0.0183 | Yemen |
| 1990s | 0.0596 | 0.1908 | 0.1312 | Yemen |
| 2000s | 0.0611 | 0.1664 | 0.1053 | Yemen |
| 2010s | 0.06 | 0.1279 | 0.0679 | Yemen |
| 2020s | 0.0455 | 0.039 | 0.0065 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Equatorial Guinea or Yemen?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.045 against 0.039 in Yemen as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Equatorial Guinea and Yemen?
- 0.006, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Yemen?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Yemen rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Yemen ranks 164th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.