Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine, State of: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 0.049 against 0.045 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.004.
That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.014 | 0.049 | 0.035 | Palestine, State of |
| 1920s | 0.014 | 0.0585 | 0.0445 | Palestine, State of |
| 1930s | 0.014 | 0.058 | 0.044 | Palestine, State of |
| 1940s | 0.014 | 0.056 | 0.042 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Equatorial Guinea or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 0.049 against 0.045 in Equatorial Guinea as of 1948.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Equatorial Guinea and Palestine, State of?
- 0.004, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Palestine, State of rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.