Ecuador vs Malaysia: Deliberative Democracy Index

Ecuador
0.366
in 2025
Malaysia
0.364
in 2025
Ecuador rank
79th
Malaysia rank
80th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
00.20.40.6190019622025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.366 against 0.364 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 79th and Malaysia ranks 80th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 11 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0911 0.024 0.0671 Ecuador
1910s 0.0939 0.024 0.0699 Ecuador
1920s 0.0672 0.024 0.0432 Ecuador
1930s 0.0677 0.024 0.0437 Ecuador
1940s 0.0796 0.0202 0.0594 Ecuador
1950s 0.1368 0.0845 0.0523 Ecuador
1960s 0.0788 0.1979 0.1191 Malaysia
1970s 0.0557 0.1567 0.101 Malaysia
1980s 0.3859 0.1621 0.2238 Ecuador
1990s 0.4395 0.1755 0.264 Ecuador
2000s 0.432 0.2215 0.2105 Ecuador
2010s 0.3966 0.2671 0.1295 Ecuador
2020s 0.4042 0.3392 0.065 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Ecuador, at 0.366 against 0.364 in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Ecuador and Malaysia?
0.002, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Ecuador ranks 79th and Malaysia ranks 80th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.