Djibouti vs Uzbekistan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Djibouti
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.154 against 0.142 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.012.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 105 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Djibouti ranks 136th and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.008 | 0.0694 | 0.0614 | Uzbekistan |
| 1930s | 0.008 | 0.0319 | 0.0239 | Uzbekistan |
| 1940s | 0.0116 | 0.0237 | 0.0121 | Uzbekistan |
| 1950s | 0.0252 | 0.0649 | 0.0397 | Uzbekistan |
| 1960s | 0.0408 | 0.0866 | 0.0458 | Uzbekistan |
| 1970s | 0.0315 | 0.0756 | 0.0441 | Uzbekistan |
| 1980s | 0.0474 | 0.1224 | 0.075 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 0.0954 | 0.081 | 0.0144 | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 0.1421 | 0.038 | 0.1041 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 0.1403 | 0.08 | 0.0603 | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 0.1415 | 0.1565 | 0.015 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Djibouti or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.154 against 0.142 in Djibouti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Djibouti and Uzbekistan?
- 0.012, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Uzbekistan?
- 105 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Uzbekistan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Djibouti ranks 136th and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.