Cyprus vs Italy: Deliberative Democracy Index

Cyprus
0.613
in 2025
Italy
0.61
in 2025
Cyprus rank
41st
Italy rank
43rd

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Cyprus
  • Italy
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.613 against 0.61 in Italy, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Italy ahead.

Cyprus ranks 41st and Italy ranks 43rd of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 12.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Italy Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0625 0.2191 0.1566 Italy
1910s 0.0657 0.229 0.1633 Italy
1920s 0.0732 0.0791 0.0059 Italy
1930s 0.0294 0.007 0.0224 Cyprus
1940s 0.0562 0.2167 0.1605 Italy
1950s 0.0586 0.6024 0.5438 Italy
1960s 0.2717 0.6476 0.3759 Italy
1970s 0.3369 0.6851 0.3482 Italy
1980s 0.5647 0.7493 0.1846 Italy
1990s 0.6473 0.7676 0.1203 Italy
2000s 0.7264 0.7796 0.0532 Italy
2010s 0.7278 0.8021 0.0743 Italy
2020s 0.6385 0.722 0.0835 Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Cyprus or Italy?
Cyprus, at 0.613 against 0.61 in Italy as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Cyprus and Italy?
0.003, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Italy?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and Italy rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Cyprus ranks 41st and Italy ranks 43rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.