Cuba vs Iran: Deliberative Democracy Index

Cuba
0.097
in 2025
Iran
0.094
in 2025
Cuba rank
144th
Iran rank
147th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Cuba
  • Iran
00.10.20.30.4190019622025

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.097 against 0.094 in Iran, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 144th and Iran ranks 147th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 8 and Iran in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Iran Difference Ahead
1900s 0.2381 0.0359 0.2023 Cuba
1910s 0.2506 0.0636 0.187 Cuba
1920s 0.1927 0.0263 0.1664 Cuba
1930s 0.1605 0.0146 0.1459 Cuba
1940s 0.3891 0.0983 0.2908 Cuba
1950s 0.1735 0.0924 0.0811 Cuba
1960s 0.04 0.022 0.018 Cuba
1970s 0.0454 0.0385 0.0069 Cuba
1980s 0.0613 0.1591 0.0978 Iran
1990s 0.054 0.2065 0.1525 Iran
2000s 0.0627 0.2215 0.1588 Iran
2010s 0.0896 0.1684 0.0788 Iran
2020s 0.101 0.1028 0.0018 Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Cuba or Iran?
Cuba, at 0.097 against 0.094 in Iran as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Cuba and Iran?
0.003, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Iran?
124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
How do Cuba and Iran rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Cuba ranks 144th and Iran ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.