Congo vs Uzbekistan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Congo
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.163 against 0.154 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.009.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 105 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Congo ranks 132nd and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Uzbekistan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.011 | 0.0694 | 0.0584 | Uzbekistan |
| 1930s | 0.011 | 0.0319 | 0.0209 | Uzbekistan |
| 1940s | 0.026 | 0.0237 | 0.0023 | Congo |
| 1950s | 0.0584 | 0.0649 | 0.0065 | Uzbekistan |
| 1960s | 0.1744 | 0.0866 | 0.0878 | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.0711 | 0.0756 | 0.0045 | Uzbekistan |
| 1980s | 0.0729 | 0.1224 | 0.0495 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 0.2467 | 0.081 | 0.1657 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.1463 | 0.038 | 0.1083 | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.1592 | 0.08 | 0.0792 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.165 | 0.1565 | 0.0085 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Congo or Uzbekistan?
- Congo, at 0.163 against 0.154 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Congo and Uzbekistan?
- 0.009, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uzbekistan?
- 105 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Uzbekistan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Congo ranks 132nd and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.