Congo vs Syria: Deliberative Democracy Index
Congo
0.163
in 2025
Syria
0.166
in 2025
Congo rank
132nd
Syria rank
131st
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Congo
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 0.166 against 0.163 in Congo, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 121 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 132nd and Syria ranks 131st of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 7 and Syria in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.004 | Syria |
| 1910s | 0.011 | 0.0346 | 0.0236 | Syria |
| 1920s | 0.011 | 0.04 | 0.029 | Syria |
| 1930s | 0.011 | 0.0689 | 0.0579 | Syria |
| 1940s | 0.026 | 0.0915 | 0.0655 | Syria |
| 1950s | 0.0584 | 0.1608 | 0.1024 | Syria |
| 1960s | 0.1744 | 0.0566 | 0.1178 | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.0711 | 0.0206 | 0.0505 | Congo |
| 1980s | 0.0729 | 0.021 | 0.0519 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.2467 | 0.021 | 0.2257 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.1463 | 0.027 | 0.1193 | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.1592 | 0.0195 | 0.1397 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.165 | 0.051 | 0.114 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Congo or Syria?
- Syria, at 0.166 against 0.163 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Congo and Syria?
- 0.003, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Syria?
- 121 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Syria rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Congo ranks 132nd and Syria ranks 131st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.