Comoros vs Qatar: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Comoros
- Qatar
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.126 against 0.12 in Qatar, a difference of 0.006.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 139th and Qatar ranks 142nd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 10 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0073 | 0.007 | 0.0003 | Comoros |
| 1910s | 0.0083 | 0.007 | 0.0013 | Comoros |
| 1940s | 0.0265 | 0.027 | 0.0005 | Qatar |
| 1950s | 0.0323 | 0.028 | 0.0043 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 0.0431 | 0.032 | 0.0111 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 0.0883 | 0.0255 | 0.0628 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 0.1447 | 0.0261 | 0.1186 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.2636 | 0.0352 | 0.2284 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2779 | 0.0743 | 0.2036 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.2803 | 0.0877 | 0.1926 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.1497 | 0.1085 | 0.0412 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Comoros or Qatar?
- Comoros, at 0.126 against 0.12 in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Comoros and Qatar?
- 0.006, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Qatar?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Qatar rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Comoros ranks 139th and Qatar ranks 142nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.