Comoros vs Djibouti: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Comoros
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.142 against 0.126 in Comoros, a difference of 0.016.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Djibouti ahead.
Comoros ranks 139th and Djibouti ranks 136th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 10 and Djibouti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0073 | 0.008 | 0.0007 | Djibouti |
| 1910s | 0.0083 | 0.008 | 0.0003 | Comoros |
| 1940s | 0.0265 | 0.017 | 0.0095 | Comoros |
| 1950s | 0.0323 | 0.0252 | 0.0071 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 0.0431 | 0.0408 | 0.0023 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 0.0883 | 0.0315 | 0.0568 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 0.1447 | 0.0474 | 0.0973 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.2636 | 0.0954 | 0.1682 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2779 | 0.1421 | 0.1358 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.2803 | 0.1403 | 0.14 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.1497 | 0.1415 | 0.0082 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Comoros or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 0.142 against 0.126 in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Comoros and Djibouti?
- 0.016, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Djibouti?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Djibouti rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Comoros ranks 139th and Djibouti ranks 136th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.