China vs Eswatini: Deliberative Democracy Index
China
0.064
in 2025
Eswatini
0.064
in 2025
China rank
154th
Eswatini rank
154th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- China
- Eswatini
How they compare
China currently reports 0.064 against 0.064 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was China ahead.
China ranks 154th and Eswatini ranks 154th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, China averaged higher in 11 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0179 | 0.0122 | 0.0057 | China |
| 1910s | 0.0873 | 0.017 | 0.0703 | China |
| 1920s | 0.1017 | 0.017 | 0.0847 | China |
| 1930s | 0.1019 | 0.017 | 0.0849 | China |
| 1940s | 0.0945 | 0.017 | 0.0775 | China |
| 1950s | 0.051 | 0.017 | 0.034 | China |
| 1960s | 0.0204 | 0.0453 | 0.0249 | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 0.0244 | 0.0527 | 0.0283 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 0.1244 | 0.0454 | 0.079 | China |
| 1990s | 0.1229 | 0.0601 | 0.0628 | China |
| 2000s | 0.1577 | 0.0868 | 0.0709 | China |
| 2010s | 0.1473 | 0.0903 | 0.057 | China |
| 2020s | 0.093 | 0.0622 | 0.0308 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, China or Eswatini?
- China, at 0.064 against 0.064 in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between China and Eswatini?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do China and Eswatini rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- China ranks 154th and Eswatini ranks 154th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.