Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Chad
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.129 against 0.122 in Chad, a difference of 0.007.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 141st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 138th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Guinea-Bissau in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.012 | 0.0049 | 0.0071 | Chad |
| 1930s | 0.012 | 0.004 | 0.008 | Chad |
| 1940s | 0.0243 | 0.004 | 0.0203 | Chad |
| 1950s | 0.0443 | 0.004 | 0.0403 | Chad |
| 1960s | 0.0842 | 0.004 | 0.0802 | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.0437 | 0.0533 | 0.0096 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 0.0148 | 0.0509 | 0.0361 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | 0.0897 | 0.1233 | 0.0336 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0.1163 | 0.2167 | 0.1004 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.1202 | 0.2256 | 0.1054 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 0.113 | 0.1965 | 0.0835 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Chad or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.129 against 0.122 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.007, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Chad ranks 141st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 138th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.