Chad vs Cuba: Deliberative Democracy Index
Chad
0.122
in 2025
Cuba
0.097
in 2025
Chad rank
141st
Cuba rank
144th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Chad
- Cuba
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.122 against 0.097 in Cuba, a difference of 0.025.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Cuba ahead.
Chad ranks 141st and Cuba ranks 144th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Cuba in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.012 | 0.1927 | 0.1807 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 0.012 | 0.1605 | 0.1485 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 0.0243 | 0.3891 | 0.3648 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 0.0443 | 0.1735 | 0.1292 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0.0842 | 0.04 | 0.0442 | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.0437 | 0.0454 | 0.0017 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.0148 | 0.0613 | 0.0465 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.0897 | 0.054 | 0.0357 | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.1163 | 0.0627 | 0.0536 | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.1202 | 0.0896 | 0.0306 | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.113 | 0.101 | 0.012 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Chad or Cuba?
- Chad, at 0.122 against 0.097 in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Chad and Cuba?
- 0.025, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Cuba?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Cuba rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Chad ranks 141st and Cuba ranks 144th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.