Cambodia vs United Arab Emirates: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Cambodia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.082 against 0.079 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Cambodia ranks 150th and United Arab Emirates ranks 148th of 175 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 3 and United Arab Emirates in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0389 | 0.1037 | 0.0648 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1980s | 0.0174 | 0.1149 | 0.0975 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | 0.1655 | 0.117 | 0.0485 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0.1787 | 0.0998 | 0.0789 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.1288 | 0.0845 | 0.0443 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0788 | 0.082 | 0.0032 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Cambodia or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.082 against 0.079 in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Cambodia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.003, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and United Arab Emirates?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Cambodia ranks 150th and United Arab Emirates ranks 148th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.