Cambodia vs Oman: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Cambodia
- Oman
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.079 against 0.073 in Oman, a difference of 0.006.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 150th and Oman ranks 151st of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 12 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.02 | 0.006 | 0.014 | Cambodia |
| 1910s | 0.02 | 0.0076 | 0.0124 | Cambodia |
| 1920s | 0.02 | 0.0075 | 0.0125 | Cambodia |
| 1930s | 0.02 | 0.0064 | 0.0136 | Cambodia |
| 1940s | 0.0216 | 0.0047 | 0.0169 | Cambodia |
| 1950s | 0.0915 | 0.0049 | 0.0866 | Cambodia |
| 1960s | 0.1594 | 0.0044 | 0.155 | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 0.0437 | 0.0146 | 0.0291 | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 0.0174 | 0.0177 | 0.0003 | Oman |
| 1990s | 0.1655 | 0.0286 | 0.1369 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0.1787 | 0.0525 | 0.1262 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.1288 | 0.0662 | 0.0626 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0788 | 0.0675 | 0.0113 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Cambodia or Oman?
- Cambodia, at 0.079 against 0.073 in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Cambodia and Oman?
- 0.006, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Oman?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Oman rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Cambodia ranks 150th and Oman ranks 151st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.