Cape Verde vs Montenegro: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Cape Verde
- Montenegro
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0.549 against 0.521 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.028.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Montenegro ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 49th and Montenegro ranks 51st of 175 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.013 | 0.052 | 0.039 | Montenegro |
| 1910s | 0.014 | 0.0525 | 0.0385 | Montenegro |
| 1990s | 0.648 | 0.3015 | 0.3465 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.6479 | 0.3815 | 0.2664 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0.6351 | 0.3958 | 0.2393 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 0.5632 | 0.4668 | 0.0963 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Cape Verde or Montenegro?
- Cape Verde, at 0.549 against 0.521 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Cape Verde and Montenegro?
- 0.028, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Montenegro?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Montenegro rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Cape Verde ranks 49th and Montenegro ranks 51st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.