Burundi vs China: Deliberative Democracy Index
Burundi
0.066
in 2025
China
0.064
in 2025
Burundi rank
153rd
China rank
154th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Burundi
- China
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.066 against 0.064 in China, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was China ahead.
Burundi ranks 153rd and China ranks 154th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 5 and China in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.005 | 0.1035 | 0.0985 | China |
| 1920s | 0.005 | 0.1017 | 0.0967 | China |
| 1930s | 0.005 | 0.1019 | 0.0969 | China |
| 1940s | 0.005 | 0.0945 | 0.0895 | China |
| 1950s | 0.0068 | 0.051 | 0.0442 | China |
| 1960s | 0.0675 | 0.0204 | 0.0471 | Burundi |
| 1970s | 0.0951 | 0.0244 | 0.0707 | Burundi |
| 1980s | 0.1637 | 0.1244 | 0.0393 | Burundi |
| 1990s | 0.2253 | 0.1229 | 0.1024 | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0.2514 | 0.1577 | 0.0937 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0.1193 | 0.1473 | 0.028 | China |
| 2020s | 0.068 | 0.093 | 0.025 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Burundi or China?
- Burundi, at 0.066 against 0.064 in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Burundi and China?
- 0.002, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and China?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and China rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Burundi ranks 153rd and China ranks 154th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.