Burundi vs China: Deliberative Democracy Index

Burundi
0.066
in 2025
China
0.064
in 2025
Burundi rank
153rd
China rank
154th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Burundi
  • China
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.066 against 0.064 in China, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was China ahead.

Burundi ranks 153rd and China ranks 154th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 5 and China in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi China Difference Ahead
1910s 0.005 0.1035 0.0985 China
1920s 0.005 0.1017 0.0967 China
1930s 0.005 0.1019 0.0969 China
1940s 0.005 0.0945 0.0895 China
1950s 0.0068 0.051 0.0442 China
1960s 0.0675 0.0204 0.0471 Burundi
1970s 0.0951 0.0244 0.0707 Burundi
1980s 0.1637 0.1244 0.0393 Burundi
1990s 0.2253 0.1229 0.1024 Burundi
2000s 0.2514 0.1577 0.0937 Burundi
2010s 0.1193 0.1473 0.028 China
2020s 0.068 0.093 0.025 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Burundi or China?
Burundi, at 0.066 against 0.064 in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Burundi and China?
0.002, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and China?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Burundi and China rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Burundi ranks 153rd and China ranks 154th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.