Burkina Faso vs Palestine, State of: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Burkina Faso
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 0.049 against 0.048 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 161st and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.034 | 0.049 | 0.015 | Palestine, State of |
| 1920s | 0.034 | 0.0585 | 0.0245 | Palestine, State of |
| 1930s | 0.037 | 0.058 | 0.021 | Palestine, State of |
| 1940s | 0.077 | 0.049 | 0.028 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Burkina Faso or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 0.049 against 0.048 in Burkina Faso as of 1948.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Burkina Faso and Palestine, State of?
- 0.001, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 1948.
- How do Burkina Faso and Palestine, State of rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Burkina Faso ranks 161st and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.