Belgium vs Germany: Deliberative Democracy Index

Belgium
0.775
in 2025
Germany
0.79
in 2025
Belgium rank
11th
Germany rank
8th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Belgium
  • Germany
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0.79 against 0.775 in Belgium, a difference of 0.015.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 11th and Germany ranks 8th of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 4 and Germany in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Germany Difference Ahead
1900s 0.3349 0.1772 0.1577 Belgium
1910s 0.2286 0.1982 0.0304 Belgium
1920s 0.363 0.4877 0.1247 Germany
1930s 0.3688 0.143 0.2258 Belgium
1940s 0.0944 0.011 0.0834 Belgium
1990s 0.7909 0.865 0.0741 Germany
2000s 0.7981 0.8695 0.0714 Germany
2010s 0.8117 0.856 0.0443 Germany
2020s 0.8043 0.8107 0.0063 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Belgium or Germany?
Germany, at 0.79 against 0.775 in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Belgium and Germany?
0.015, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?
80 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Belgium ranks 11th and Germany ranks 8th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.