Austria vs Japan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Austria
0.729
in 2025
Japan
0.729
in 2025
Austria rank
18th
Japan rank
18th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Austria
- Japan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.729 against 0.729 in Japan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 18th and Japan ranks 18th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 8 and Japan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.243 | 0.152 | 0.091 | Austria |
| 1920s | 0.3852 | 0.1563 | 0.2289 | Austria |
| 1930s | 0.1849 | 0.1214 | 0.0635 | Austria |
| 1940s | 0.4986 | 0.2466 | 0.252 | Austria |
| 1950s | 0.5459 | 0.5616 | 0.0157 | Japan |
| 1960s | 0.6142 | 0.711 | 0.0968 | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.6739 | 0.7237 | 0.0498 | Japan |
| 1980s | 0.7586 | 0.7299 | 0.0287 | Austria |
| 1990s | 0.7672 | 0.7372 | 0.03 | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.7747 | 0.7468 | 0.0279 | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.7739 | 0.7352 | 0.0387 | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.7267 | 0.7323 | 0.0057 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Austria or Japan?
- Austria, at 0.729 against 0.729 in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Austria and Japan?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Japan?
- 101 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Japan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Austria ranks 18th and Japan ranks 18th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.