Armenia vs Malaysia: Deliberative Democracy Index
Armenia
0.376
in 2025
Malaysia
0.364
in 2025
Armenia rank
77th
Malaysia rank
80th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Armenia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.376 against 0.364 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.012.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 77th and Malaysia ranks 80th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 7 and Malaysia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.0735 | 0.024 | 0.0495 | Armenia |
| 1920s | 0.0694 | 0.024 | 0.0454 | Armenia |
| 1930s | 0.0319 | 0.024 | 0.0079 | Armenia |
| 1940s | 0.0237 | 0.0202 | 0.0035 | Armenia |
| 1950s | 0.0649 | 0.0845 | 0.0196 | Malaysia |
| 1960s | 0.0866 | 0.1979 | 0.1113 | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 0.0756 | 0.1567 | 0.0811 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 0.1224 | 0.1621 | 0.0397 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.3453 | 0.1755 | 0.1698 | Armenia |
| 2000s | 0.1896 | 0.2215 | 0.0319 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.2956 | 0.2671 | 0.0285 | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.3392 | 0.1608 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Armenia or Malaysia?
- Armenia, at 0.376 against 0.364 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Armenia and Malaysia?
- 0.012, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Malaysia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Malaysia rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Armenia ranks 77th and Malaysia ranks 80th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.