How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Zimbabwe?

14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Moldova vs Zimbabwe: Countries with accredited independent national human rights

Moldova

2 number

in 2025

Zimbabwe

2 number

in 2025

Moldova rank

1st

Zimbabwe rank

1st

Countries with accredited independent national human rights over time

Moldova
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 2 number against 2 number in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Moldova ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Moldova	Zimbabwe	Ahead
2000s	0 number	0 number	—
2010s	1.33 number	1.33 number	—
2020s	2 number	2 number	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions, Moldova or Zimbabwe?: Moldova, at 2 number against 2 number in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions between Moldova and Zimbabwe?: 0 number, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Zimbabwe?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Moldova and Zimbabwe rank globally for countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions?: Moldova ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Zimbabwe: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-independent-national-human-rights-institution/moldova/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-independent-national-human-rights-institution/moldova/zimbabwe/">Moldova vs Zimbabwe: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions
Unit: number
Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 194 places, 2,716 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed: 30 October 2026

Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant).