How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?

14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions

Moldova

2 number

in 2025

Tanzania, United Republic of

2 number

in 2025

Moldova rank

1st

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

1st

Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions over time

Moldova
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 2 number against 2 number in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 1st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 194 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Moldova	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 number	1 number	1 number	Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s	1.33 number	2 number	0.6667 number	Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s	2 number	2 number	0 number	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions, Moldova or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Moldova, at 2 number against 2 number in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions between Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0 number, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions?: Moldova ranks 1st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-independent-national-human-rights-institution/moldova/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-independent-national-human-rights-institution/moldova/tanzania/">Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions
Unit: number
Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 194 places, 2,716 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant).