How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Georgia?

14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Georgia: Countries with accredited independent national human rights

Austria

2 number

in 2025

Georgia

2 number

in 2025

Austria rank

1st

Georgia rank

1st

Countries with accredited independent national human rights over time

Austria
Georgia

How they compare

Austria currently reports 2 number against 2 number in Georgia, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Georgia ranks 1st of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Georgia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	1 number	0 number	1 number	Austria
2010s	1 number	2 number	1 number	Georgia
2020s	1.67 number	2 number	0.3333 number	Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions, Austria or Georgia?: Austria, at 2 number against 2 number in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions between Austria and Georgia?: 0 number, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Georgia?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Austria and Georgia rank globally for countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions?: Austria ranks 1st and Georgia ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Georgia: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-independent-national-human-rights-institution/austria/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-independent-national-human-rights-institution/austria/georgia/">Austria vs Georgia: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions
Unit: number
Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 194 places, 2,716 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed: 30 October 2026

Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant).