Australia vs Zimbabwe: Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions
Australia
2 number
in 2025
Zimbabwe
2 number
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st
Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions over time
- Australia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2 number against 2 number in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 number | 0 number | 2 number | Australia |
| 2010s | 2 number | 1.33 number | 0.6667 number | Australia |
| 2020s | 2 number | 2 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions, Australia or Zimbabwe?
- Australia, at 2 number against 2 number in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions between Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 number, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions?
- Australia ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Countries with accredited independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant).