Uganda vs Zambia: Citizen support for democracy

Uganda
0.8817
in 2020
Zambia
0.9472
in 2020
Uganda rank
18th
Zambia rank
15th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Uganda
  • Zambia
00.250.50.751199920092020

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.9472 against 0.8817 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0655.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.

Uganda ranks 18th and Zambia ranks 15th of 144 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2025 0.5811 0.3786 Zambia
2010s 0.8303 0.9277 0.0974 Zambia
2020s 0.8817 0.9472 0.0655 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Uganda or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.9472 against 0.8817 in Uganda as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Uganda and Zambia?
0.0655, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zambia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Uganda and Zambia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Uganda ranks 18th and Zambia ranks 15th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.