Senegal vs Slovenia: Citizen support for democracy

Senegal
0.4563
in 2020
Slovenia
0.4731
in 2020
Senegal rank
33rd
Slovenia rank
31st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Senegal
  • Slovenia
-1-0.500.51199120052020

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.4731 against 0.4563 in Senegal, a difference of 0.0168.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Slovenia ahead.

Senegal ranks 33rd and Slovenia ranks 31st of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Senegal Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0709 0.4205 0.3496 Slovenia
2010s 0.5744 0.3483 0.2261 Senegal
2020s 0.4563 0.4731 0.0168 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Senegal or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.4731 against 0.4563 in Senegal as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Senegal and Slovenia?
0.0168, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Slovenia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Senegal and Slovenia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Senegal ranks 33rd and Slovenia ranks 31st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.