North Macedonia vs Romania: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- North Macedonia
- Romania
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports -0.8789 against -0.9167 in Romania, a difference of 0.0378.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Romania ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 104th and Romania ranks 107th of 144 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.846 | -0.6459 | 0.2001 | Romania |
| 2000s | -0.7894 | -0.6844 | 0.105 | Romania |
| 2010s | -0.7955 | -0.8504 | 0.0548 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | -0.8789 | -0.9167 | 0.0378 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, North Macedonia or Romania?
- North Macedonia, at -0.8789 against -0.9167 in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between North Macedonia and Romania?
- 0.0378, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do North Macedonia and Romania rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- North Macedonia ranks 104th and Romania ranks 107th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.