Mozambique vs Thailand: Citizen support for democracy

Mozambique
-1.71
in 2020
Thailand
-1.74
in 2020
Mozambique rank
139th
Thailand rank
141st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Mozambique
  • Thailand
-2-1.5-1-0.500.5200220112020

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports -1.71 against -1.74 in Thailand, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Thailand ahead.

Mozambique ranks 139th and Thailand ranks 141st of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s -1.51 0.0537 1.56 Thailand
2010s -1.61 -0.8543 0.757 Thailand
2020s -1.71 -1.74 0.031 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Mozambique or Thailand?
Mozambique, at -1.71 against -1.74 in Thailand as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Mozambique and Thailand?
0.03, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Thailand?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Mozambique and Thailand rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Mozambique ranks 139th and Thailand ranks 141st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.