Mongolia vs Tajikistan: Citizen support for democracy

Mongolia
-1.15
in 2020
Tajikistan
-1.19
in 2020
Mongolia rank
122nd
Tajikistan rank
125th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Mongolia
  • Tajikistan
-2-1.5-1-0.50200320112020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports -1.15 against -1.19 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.04.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 122nd and Tajikistan ranks 125th of 144 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s -0.5554 -1.7 1.14 Mongolia
2010s -0.8639 -1.4 0.5407 Mongolia
2020s -1.15 -1.19 0.0384 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Mongolia or Tajikistan?
Mongolia, at -1.15 against -1.19 in Tajikistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Mongolia and Tajikistan?
0.04, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tajikistan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Tajikistan rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Mongolia ranks 122nd and Tajikistan ranks 125th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.