Malaysia vs Nigeria: Citizen support for democracy

Malaysia
-0.7681
in 2020
Nigeria
-0.801
in 2020
Malaysia rank
97th
Nigeria rank
99th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Malaysia
  • Nigeria
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199520072020

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports -0.7681 against -0.801 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0329.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 97th and Nigeria ranks 99th of 144 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s -0.3485 -0.4668 0.1183 Malaysia
2010s -0.4646 -0.4985 0.0339 Malaysia
2020s -0.7681 -0.801 0.0329 Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Malaysia or Nigeria?
Malaysia, at -0.7681 against -0.801 in Nigeria as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Malaysia and Nigeria?
0.0329, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Nigeria?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do Malaysia and Nigeria rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Malaysia ranks 97th and Nigeria ranks 99th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.