Lesotho vs North Macedonia: Citizen support for democracy

Lesotho
-0.8851
in 2020
North Macedonia
-0.8789
in 2020
Lesotho rank
105th
North Macedonia rank
104th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Lesotho
  • North Macedonia
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199820092020

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports -0.8789 against -0.8851 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0062.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Lesotho ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 104th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s -0.5689 -0.7894 0.2204 Lesotho
2010s -0.6401 -0.7955 0.1554 Lesotho
2020s -0.8851 -0.8789 0.0062 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Lesotho or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at -0.8789 against -0.8851 in Lesotho as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Lesotho and North Macedonia?
0.0062, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and North Macedonia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Lesotho and North Macedonia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Lesotho ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 104th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.