Lebanon vs Rwanda: Citizen support for democracy

Lebanon
-0.1699
in 2020
Rwanda
-0.177
in 2020
Lebanon rank
67th
Rwanda rank
68th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Lebanon
  • Rwanda
-0.200.20.4200220112020

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports -0.1699 against -0.177 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0071.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.

Lebanon ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 68th of 144 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2448 0.0697 0.1751 Lebanon
2010s 0.0335 -0.1669 0.2003 Lebanon
2020s -0.1699 -0.177 0.0071 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Lebanon or Rwanda?
Lebanon, at -0.1699 against -0.177 in Rwanda as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Lebanon and Rwanda?
0.0071, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Rwanda?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Lebanon and Rwanda rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Lebanon ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 68th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.