Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Citizen support for democracy

Latvia
-0.4722
in 2020
Zimbabwe
-0.3361
in 2020
Latvia rank
79th
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
-0.5-0.2500.250.5199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -0.3361 against -0.4722 in Latvia, a difference of 0.1361.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 144 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2454 0.1014 0.3468 Zimbabwe
2000s -0.3132 0.1698 0.483 Zimbabwe
2010s -0.4845 0.126 0.6105 Zimbabwe
2020s -0.4722 -0.3361 0.1362 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -0.3361 against -0.4722 in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
0.1361, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Latvia ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.