Jordan vs Romania: Citizen support for democracy

Jordan
-0.9346
in 2020
Romania
-0.9167
in 2020
Jordan rank
109th
Romania rank
107th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Jordan
  • Romania
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199020052020

How they compare

Romania currently reports -0.9167 against -0.9346 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0179.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Romania ahead.

Jordan ranks 109th and Romania ranks 107th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Romania Difference Ahead
2000s -0.9447 -0.6775 0.2672 Romania
2010s -0.7684 -0.8504 0.0819 Jordan
2020s -0.9346 -0.9167 0.0179 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Jordan or Romania?
Romania, at -0.9167 against -0.9346 in Jordan as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Jordan and Romania?
0.0179, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Romania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Jordan and Romania rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Jordan ranks 109th and Romania ranks 107th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.