Jamaica vs Moldova: Citizen support for democracy

Jamaica
-1.39
in 2020
Moldova
-1.42
in 2020
Jamaica rank
130th
Moldova rank
131st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Jamaica
  • Moldova
-1.5-1-0.50199620082020

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports -1.39 against -1.42 in Moldova, a difference of 0.03.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 130th and Moldova ranks 131st of 144 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s -0.1028 -1.33 1.23 Jamaica
2010s -0.7963 -1.42 0.6239 Jamaica
2020s -1.39 -1.42 0.0257 Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Jamaica or Moldova?
Jamaica, at -1.39 against -1.42 in Moldova as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Jamaica and Moldova?
0.03, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Moldova?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Jamaica and Moldova rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Jamaica ranks 130th and Moldova ranks 131st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.